- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Hoffman Marsh. v/r - TP 14:31, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hoffman Channel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
2000 foot channel with no economic importance. article content easily covered in the Point Isabel/Hoffman marsh articles. (i added a navtemp before realizing how small the subject was) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:44, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge & Redirect to Hoffman Marsh. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:12, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know why i always forget to propose a merge and redirect. you are correct of course.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:19, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:12, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:12, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know whether it should be redirected to the marsh or Point Isabel article, but either seems fine as long as people can easily find the information.--Milowent • hasspoken 15:16, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.