Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holderness Area Rural Transport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to East Riding of Yorkshire#Transport.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:41, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Holderness Area Rural Transport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable company Fails WP:GNG & WP:CORP, Also User:HART created the article so also per WP:COI as well as WP:NOTHOST -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 02:48, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Davey2010T 02:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Davey2010T 02:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Davey2010T 02:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Davey2010T 02:53, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to East Riding of Yorkshire#transport-- This is a small local bus company that probably only operates as a result of public subsidy, and operates like that, because commercial operators cannot make a profit from it. I have added a sentence to the transport section of the East Riding page, with an external link to the organisation's webpage, but that link is rather useless in that the page as yet has no content. It appears to be newly registered. The organistaion has thus gone about things the wrong way round, by creating a WP page and only then beginning work on theri own website. Peterkingiron (talk) 09:44, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and Redirect per Peterkingiron. aycliffe ^talk 07:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.