Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holiday Extras (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was G11 speedy deleted by Cryptic. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 08:43, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Holiday Extras

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Holiday Extras
• Articles for deletion/Holiday Extras (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Holiday Extras (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per previous AfD where it was deleted: a fundamentally promotional article. in other words, spam. Having all the hallmarks of a commissioned work, the vast plethora of sources is designed to confuse any patroller and game the the system. A random check of 20 or so shows them nearly all to be promotional in some way. IMO this should be speedied and salted. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:58, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, even if the company were notable, this article needs WP:TNT. Jfire (talk) 23:00, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Travel and tourism, Germany, United Kingdom, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:04, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - right from the very first sentence, it sounds like an advertisement. Doesn't this fall under WP:G11 (or maybe even WP:G4)? Limmidy (talk) 00:04, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Nothing but promotional garbage, and poorly formatted promotional garbage at that. Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 03:51, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.