- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 03:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
2 non-wiki ghits. It may exist, but it doesn't seem to meet WP:NOTABILITY. Contested prod Kathy A. 13:01, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - As per nom. Has no sources and fails criteria in WP:NOTE.--Edtropolis 13:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Without sources, notability is unestablished and it fails WP:V (I don't interpret the blog in the google results as a reliable source).--Chaser - T 15:01, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowball delete - WP:V is impossible.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 15:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The only place you'll find this term is on blogs, primarily here: phisherman. "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information," see WP:NOT. StudierMalMarburg 15:30, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Just because it's "used frequently by fishing bloggers" doesn't mean it can be included on Wikipedia. It is not WP:V, and no sources will ever be found. WP:SNOW it already! *Cremepuff222* 01:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Unattributed rubbish, per WP:NFT. Dhaluza 23:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.