Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Home Alone Horror
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 02:09, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Home Alone Horror (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable film lacking GHIts and GNEWS of substance. Article Prod was removed by author> Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 01:07, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as article fails notability criteria for films. Armbrust Talk Contribs 08:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unsourced article about a pretty non-notable movie. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 17:52, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:TOOSOON. As the filmmaker is Anthony Porrey and the article author is User:Aporrey, I think COI is more than apparent. The director does have a Myspace page... but film and filmmaker are not even non-notable enough to make it to IMDB. Neither he nor his films has any coverage in reliable sources. Sorry Anthony... get your film releasd, get some coverage, win some awards... and then perhaps someone not involved with the film will write the article. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:41, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.