Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Home for Incurables

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 03:34, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Home for Incurables (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

There are numerous such homes across the world and there seems no point in highlighting just two, particularly since nothing notable has been identified. In the light of the discussion here, I think the page should be deleted and it can be recreated if at least two such homes get pages. TerriersFan (talk) 13:01, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a comment, as I said I'm fine with deleting them; since they're hospitals, they're obviously notable in and of themselves, so I would point out that your motivation in deleting this page is aesthetic, not a matter of notability; the page is disambiguating two entirely notable things. But deleting it out of aesthetic concern is perfectly fine, and probably trumps any concerns about future link integrity I might have had in creating the page, so carry on. --❨Ṩtruthious ℬandersnatch❩ 13:18, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the page is pointless, since is disambiguates two pages that don't exist.  Atyndall93 | talk  13:36, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• delete- even if they did exist, there's no need for a disambig page for just two artices, a disambig link to the other article would just go at the top of each. Merkin's mum 13:58, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete disambiguation to non-existent articles --Pustefix (talk) 18:19, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above.--Berig (talk) 18:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - since nothing links here. I'd suggest that if either of these hospitals is notable, that the articles be created, rather than this dab page. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:25, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.