Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homeless in hawaii
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-27 02:23Z
This appears to be an essay consisting of original research. Heimstern Läufer 08:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, clearly an essay. --Kinu t/c 08:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. MER-C 08:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, pretty clear.--Dmz5 10:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Obvious candidate for deletion. --Folantin 11:05, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Also wrong cAsE! - Cate | Talk 14:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - essay, WP:OR, WP:NFT. Moreschi Deletion! 15:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There might be some useful information that the author could use to edit Hawaii or homelessness, so I think it's just a new person who's unaware of what constitutes an article here. Just because he wrote it for school doesn't mean the topic is useless per WP:NFT. 206.213.209.31 16:00, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I totally agree and messages have been left to this effect on his talk page but he is not responsive to changing it (and in fact just removes the deletion tags). After reading a recent NY Times article about this subject (which oddly enough he did not use as a source) I think there is definitely a viable article here.--Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 18:22, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As a Hawaiian, I feel sad for the homeless, but this is an essay and has original research. Not suitable for WP. Sr13 (T|C) 20:10, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletions. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 20:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia isn't a BLOG. Maddy626 10:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- Per reasons stated above--SUIT 20:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with a strong suggestion to the author to merge this into the Hawaii article (after discussion there, please). SkierRMH,23:42, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Nonsense article, dealing with pity for the poor. -- Dasnedius 18:06, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unencyclopedic. —ShadowHalo 04:04, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.