- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. henrik•talk 13:55, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hominity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced; original research; appears to be promoting ideas of the author. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 21:07, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The word has been re-coined several times, but each coinage seems destined not to take. This text seems to have nothing to do with any of the references I found. Mangoe (talk) 21:36, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I have no indication that it has stuck anywhere, and if it has, I don't know if this can be more than a dicdef + etymology. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Original research--MLKLewis (talk) 19:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.