- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 00:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Homosociality (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
I'm not digging this page. The term looks like a neologism, and has been tagged for references for most of 2007. It strikes me as a promotional page for certain academics. In any case, a "citation needed" tag on a claim that the term is frequently used has been ignored since February, suggesting that the term is not used much even within the sociological community. Betsy Heavans (talk) 00:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- comment seems like a legitimate term and idea, more than a neologism, but it is not sourced. eitherway it has a sister article heterosocial.LessThanClippers (talk) 00:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, I've put a prod tag on the even shorter sister article. Betsy Heavans (talk) 00:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep needs work though, thought i'd never heard of it before it does appear to be in frequent use and quite well documented. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 01:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This concept is well-documented in the social sciences. The article is too focused on a single reference, but this isn't a problem with the topic itself, and it can easily be remedied. Valerius (talk) 02:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep over 9000 articles on Google Scholar - I haven't vetted them, but even if only 1% of them are reliable - this concept is notable. Fosnez (talk) 11:01, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Hardly a neologism, as it has been used at least since the 1970s in thousands of articles (as mentioned above) and hundreds of books (check Google Books). --Itub (talk) 12:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 13:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: I certainly found references to it when I was studying Arthurian Literature at University.
Duggy 1138 (talk) 20:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep. Notable. Queerudite (talk) 02:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, appears to be a notable term that would get usage even outside the likes of gender studies and sociology.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 05:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - this appears to be a notable field of scholarship within sociology. Aleta (Sing) 15:25, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.