Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoover Silicon Eradication System
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was eradicated as obvious hoax, a bored-one-day joke article that doesn't have a chance. Kinu t/c 04:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hoover Silicon Eradication System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
The article is a hoax. It fails to meet WP:V. It cites no reliable sources. Neparis (talk) 03:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Hoax. See Neil Pomerleau Brian Dubois Chris Windhorst ELHS Edward Little High School Ice Cream Project Chemistry Dimitri. Top Videos 2007 And also look at the founders... at Christopher Windhorst and Neil Pomerleau --Pmedema (talk) 03:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Mmmm... Hoaxalicious, and now with Retsin(R)! --Jayron32|talk|contribs 03:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - WP:DUCK; the West Virginia Board of Medicine is a licensing group, and would have no purpose purchasing such a device, no matter its health benefits. This article is the only thing that comes up on different searches. LonelyBeacon (talk) 04:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Obvious hoax - there's no sensible purpose in removing "silicon particles" (sand) from the water flowing across a dam, and even less potential purpose in a medical licensing group purchasing the device to "use the vast amount of silicon for medicinal purposes". One of the images is actually of a system in Switzerland, to boot. Zetawoof(ζ) 04:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as clear hoax per everyone above, there's not much else I can say. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 04:38, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.