Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hopeless romantics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hopeless romantics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article has been here for months with nothing been done to make it into an encyclopedia article. I can't really see how it can ever be an encyclopedia article. Corvus cornix 07:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as above. Dazz(talk) 07:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Wikipedia is not a dictionary. "In love with love" indeed... --Charlene 08:01, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete NOT WP:NOT#DICT. Moving the article to wikidictionary wouldnt be a good thing as this article more suited for urbandictionary etc.. Corpx 08:00, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above --It's-is-not-a-genitive 12:53, 1 July 2007 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete this foolishness. Bigdaddy1981 21:58, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete; ah, but a hopeless romantic would know that this would happen, and would move on elsewhere... c'est la vie. Mandsford 22:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I'm not in love with this article. Cedars 04:44, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.