Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hopkins' Parcel Bin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete G1 by AliveFreeHappy. (non-admin close). RMHED (talk) 22:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hopkins' Parcel Bin

I think this might be a hoax. It's about a statue in Whitley Bay of a garbage collector and trash can/wastebasket. No sources (link on page is irrelevant) and my google searching turned up no sources. If sources could be found, the uniqueness of this might help make it notable, but as of right now, fails WP:V. I'm going to canvass people who worked on the Whitley Bay article to try and get a better idea of whether this is real. CastAStone /^/(talk) 15:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as joke/hoax. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:13, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Hoax - prove me wrong if you can. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 15:43, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete WP:CSD#G11. It's a hoax for sure. But it's also a cleverly disguised advertisement. Check the (only) link provided. Yng varr 15:53, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom as silly hoax. --Lockley (talk) 15:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per Yngvarr, ~~disguised advert~~ . (or to be frank, pure vandalism. Deprodder has been reverted for vandalism a lot without getting a single warning, this is not good). Greswik (talk) 18:51, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as vandalism. So tagged. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 21:57, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

It was not advertising, the bin website was merely a hoax source site. it was the only bin website i could find Gnomerat (talk) 14:02, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]