Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How It Works (magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Imagine Publishing. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 18:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How It Works (magazine) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no notability. Fails WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 21:36, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:CORP. Google search for news mentions gives 6 results. INeverCry 21:56, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Bmusician 02:07, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Στc. 01:10, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• If not kept, then redirect to Imagine Publishing. There is some coverage of the magazine out there that we shouldn't delete all reference to it.[1].--Milowent • ^hasspoken 02:14, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Imagine Publishing, per WP:NMAG, WP:GNG. No sourced content to be merged. -- Trevj (talk) 10:21, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.