Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to Bear Down
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted as copyvio (G12) by Richardshusr. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 11:42, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- How to Bear Down (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Page is full of nonsense, and any useful information on the subject can be found in the article Rectal examination. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 05:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Turn your head and delete per nom. Spell4yr (talk) 05:10, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:NOTGUIDE makes this fairly straightforward. - Vianello (talk) 05:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete hahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaa......................WP:BOLLOCKS. Delete per nom. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 05:38, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Someone please contact the author. Sincerely, Hellboy2hell (talk) 05:41, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: a lot of this looks exactly like the wording, etc., at this, which itself claims to be culled from another source, so this might be a copyright violation. Personally, I'm not in the mood to inspect this further (pun intended), so if someone else could assess the similarity and tag if necessary/deemed similar enough, that'd be great. --Kinu t/c 05:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as per G12 copyright violation from [1]. Also per WP:NOTGUIDE Nazgul533 talk contribs 05:51, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not a guide. Not an article either. Not sufficient encyclopedic content to merit rewrite of copyrighted material. Whatever content could be rephrased into an article would better serve at Rectal examination. Dlohcierekim 06:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as complete nonsense. Nothing is verifiable and it's a copyvio. Happyme22 (talk) 06:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If someone else could speedy this. I've already shot my mouth of here. Dlohcierekim 06:07, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.