Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to Live a Low-Carbon Life
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 05:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- How to Live a Low-Carbon Life (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails Wikipedia:NBOOK#Criteria. SnottyWong chatter 20:09, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Clicking on any of the handy find sources links above shows significant coverage. Unomi (talk) 06:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Clearly notable. Multiple reviews are cited in the article; plenty of significant coverage. Johnfos (talk) 06:57, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Do any of the sources verify that the book meets one of the criteria listed at Wikipedia:NBOOK#Criteria, or are these sources mainly advertisements for the book? While it's plain to see that there are a lot of hits on Google for that search term, that doesn't imply notability. Clicking on the "handy find sources link" above results in plenty of links to the book's website, places to buy the book, regurgitated press releases of the book, etc. Also, the Clarion award is clearly not a major literary award. SnottyWong comment 13:58, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Article clearly meets notability criteria 1: "The book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself, with at least some of these works serving a general audience". Sources of these multiple published works include: Journal of Environmental Health Research, The Guardian, and The Times, which are cited in the article. -- Johnfos (talk) 16:43, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.