Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to Make an Ex-Girlfriend Jealous
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was article Speedily deleted by KillerChihuahua. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- How to Make an Ex-Girlfriend Jealous (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Disputed prod. How-to on an unencyclopedic topic. I don't see any speedy criteria that apply to this page, but feel free to apply if you do see one. Kevin (talk) 03:41, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- speedy criteria A7 (no indication of importance) might apply here. It doesn't give any sources or indications of why it is a notable topic. HominidMachinae (talk) 05:13, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe A7 only applies to discrete entities like corporations and people. I'm tempted to try to G3 it, but I felt like that was kind of stretching it. Kevin (talk) 05:23, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- "Shit you made up while drinking" is not yet a valid criterion. Drmies (talk) 05:39, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe A7 only applies to discrete entities like corporations and people. I'm tempted to try to G3 it, but I felt like that was kind of stretching it. Kevin (talk) 05:23, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Well, that was an amusing reading. Other than that yes, it seems that A7 wouldn't apply. Now, the article is not about the creative work "How to Make an Ex-Girlfriend Jealous", but it is the creative work itself, but I guess that's more on the WP:NOTHOWTO realm - frankieMR (talk) 05:48, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no matter what, per WP:NOT, WP:GNG, WP:N and whatever else applies. I'm going to try and speedy it. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:50, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I tried G3 and G11 (it promotes the author). Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:52, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. Borderline, in my opinion, for speedy deletion as promotional of its author's opinions and "program". JamesBWatson (talk) 14:05, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Article was speedy deleted per G3, G10, G11, and IAR. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:06, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- G10, nice touch - frankieMR (talk) 01:18, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.