Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to be a Hardass Gangsta

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash^talk 00:15, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deletizzle this mutha. Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 17:31, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Hopefully this can be speedy deleted as nonsense. I've tagged it as such. Friday (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's not actually nonsense, nonsense is more like random characters that are completely unintelligible, ie "GFGD^%$$WW" would be nonsense. That seems to be how it's generally been explained to me. Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 18:57, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:48, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• 70.32.1.205 17:56, 15 September 2005 (UTC) Keep it. It serves a purpose as a humorous entry. It can be relocated to a humor category which would serve a more appropriate purpose.[reply]
  • We have no sense of humor here on Wikipedia. Unless you count BJAODN. Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 18:57, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as nonsense/link spam for thedilly.com. -- MCB 18:55, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I know it doesn't fit the actual definition of nonsense, but some admins are willing to interpret CSD liberally. It seems clear that there will be no serious discussion of keeping this, so a speedy would certainly save time and effort. I'd rather see AfD used where there might be useful discussion. Friday (talk) 19:24, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't disagree, but I'm simply going on general interpretation of CSD criteria. Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 20:07, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • I know what you mean. There is a distinction between "patent nonsense" like random characters/words, and "nonsense in the context of an encyclopedia" which contains actual sentences, but they are more or less incomprehensible in the context of being a WP article. The former is apparently what is meant in the CSD, but there should be a way to refer to the latter as well, and streamline its deletion. MCB 21:59, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- Hardass Gangastas can write how-to wikibooks if they wish, but not articles. --Quasipalm 19:28, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Userfy if that would help. If the anon who created this would like to create an account, I'll happily move this article to your user space where it can live in humorous peace. Ooops, got confused. This article was created by a logged-in user. I've copied the content there. Friday (talk) 19:29, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delizzle. Fo' shizzle. — Phil Welch 21:23, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Bring in Arnie with his Hummernator --81.77.183.210 19:06, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, WP:NOT a how to guide. --Apyule 05:34, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.