Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to help people
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SNOW--no other conclusion than delete is possible, but it does not match any speedy criteria. DGG ( talk ) 02:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- How to help people (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable topic, unsourced, fails WP:GNG violates WP:ORIGINAL where Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. Mediran talk to me! 00:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete: clearly not what Wikipedia is for. -- Patchy1 00:25, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Right! Also, I was thinking a criteria where this subject is best. Unfortunately, I cannot and so I just nominated it for deletion. Mediran talk to me! 00:38, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete - Undeniably and explicitly inappropriate for Wikipedia. SwisterTwister talk 01:14, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete: Wikipedia is not a how-to manual. RubinkumarTalk 01:29, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.