Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to save a life (2011)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 17:39, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How to save a life (2011)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N. No search results for <"How to save a life" "Nina Smythe">, <"Nina Smythe" film>, etc. Possibly WP:HOAX. jonkerz ♠talk 17:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as apparent hoax; even if it isn't a hoax, there's no evidence of notability, and the article itself is totally unreferenced. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:11, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No opinion on whether this is a hoax, but it is clear as Stolychnaya that this ostensible indy film doesn't meet the threshold of GNG. Carrite (talk) 19:30, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is the only hit I was able to find for it. I don't recognize the site at all, but it looks like it's based on user submissions. The photo for "Harriet Newlands" was taken from this model site (thank you, drag-and-drop Google image search), so it's likely just another iteration of the same hoax we have here. postdlf (talk) 19:31, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - In light of the above, I have dropped a HOAX tag on the piece. Carrite (talk) 19:35, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I have notified the content creator, User:Bravo369, of the hoax allegation, emphasized the severity of hoaxing at WP, and invited them to show up here to calm our concerns if this allegation is wrong. The closing administrator is advised that this is potentially a serial hoaxer involved here and that a wielding of the banhammer may be additionally called for. Carrite (talk) 19:57, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (babble) @ 23:55, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia -related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (chat) @ 23:55, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it does not appear to meet Wikipedia's policy of verifiability. Erik (talk | contribs) 23:57, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, if it is not a hoax, it is a spectacularly obscure film with no third party coverage to indicate notability. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 08:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NF. Worse, the topic and principals fail WP:V. Film, director, producer, and cast are unverifiable. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is the only 'source' I found. [1] Seems like a hoax. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 21:23, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.