- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was kept, no consensus to delete Added references seem to remove notability/verifiability opbjections `'mikka 00:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hubba Hideout (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Nom - unsourced; not notable; speeded once already Rklawton 03:48, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:N, WP:RS, WP:V, etc. Could possibly be speedied as spam for a YouTube video. Heather 15:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or redirect to The Embarcadero (San Francisco), which is a famous skateboarding spot. If no sources are found, seems like a useful redirect. Recury 16:37, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. While it's always impressive when skateboarders can type, we can't have an article about every corner in America where they slam around on their boards. Qworty 20:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - You've been around long enough to know WP:CIVIL, right? Also, are you impressed yet? I don't see why it's necessary to be so insulting. You should try making a more substantive argument, instead of throwing out some catch-all. --notJackhorkheimer (talk / contribs) 06:05, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Hubba Hideout is actually up there with Love Park and The Embarcadero (San Francisco) in terms of the most well-known skate spots, and has been getting some press about efforts to make the spot unskateable. Notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia, especially when understood in terms of its notability in the skateboarding community. [1] [2] [3] [4] --notJackhorkheimer (talk / contribs) 06:23, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Based on the links provided above that both provide sources and demonstrate notability, I'm withdrawing my nomination. The AfD will still need to run its course, but I now see no reason to delete this article. Rklawton 23:22, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.