Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human appearance in India (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 20:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Human appearance in India

There are several reasons: a) The scope of this article is not defined. b) Vague term. Human appearance usually refers to physical human appearance like skin color, height and does not usually refer to clothing and ornament. c) Redundant topic. Clothing in India is already covered by the article Indian dress. d) No article with similar heading or scope exists in Wikipedia. One wouldn't see an article on Human appearance in Russia because the heading itself is too vague. e) The article is currently orphaned and therefore, serves little purpose. Incidious (talk) 03:16, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom's cogent arguments, esp b. and c. (though I'm not convinced by e.). Drmies (talk) 03:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom or merge with Indian dress if there is anything that can be merged (perhaps the ornamentation?). — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 04:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —-- Tinu Cherian - 07:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 07:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--GDibyendu (talk) 09:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The content may be merged with Indian dress. Salih (talk) 10:09, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. If there's info in this article that isn't in Indian dress (that should be), it should be merged. OlYeller^Talktome 10:25, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom (Aside: Wow! What a stilted article title). Abecedare (talk) 19:39, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Looking at the title, I assumed it was about when humans first appeared in India. — goethean ॐ 20:32, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Title is really vague. I wasn't even sure what the article was about until I took a look at the page. This article doesn't cover anything that hasn't been covered by Indian dress. --vi5in^[talk] 20:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This article has no Encyclopedic value--Suyog ^{talk to me!} 05:01, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "Human appearance in India?" What does that even mean? - Max ^{- You were saying?} 21:38, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.