Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humming Airways

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Sourcing has been sh own to be insufficient Star Mississippi 02:22, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Humming Airways

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Humming Airways (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing to satisfy WP:GNG. Lack of significant coverage in reliable and secondary sources. WP:TOOSOON also. Bakhtar40 (talk) 04:17, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Aviation, and Argentina. Bakhtar40 (talk) 04:17, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Moderate Keep It might be seen as WP:TOOSOON but has some coverage in the media WP:BTMBS. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. There are many more websites and I am not sure which ones are actually reliable but some are reliable Argentinian news websites. HilssaMansen19 (talk) 14:44, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HilssaMansen19, None of the sources you gave are reliable. All of them look like paid articles. Bakhtar40 (talk) 06:28, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – Passes in WP:NCORP. Svartner (talk) 12:11, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Svartner, On which ground it passes WP:NCORP. Let's talk about the references. Bakhtar40 (talk) 06:22, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 06:32, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I'll try to summarize the sources:
  • [1]. Infobae appears to be significant coverage, though there is no byline on this article.
  • [2]. Humming Airways published by the subject itself, does not contribute to notability.
  • [3]. Aviacion News this is an interview with the founders, does not contribute to notability.
  • [4]. Aviacionline reads as... very promotional.
  • [5]. Villamaria Vivo this provides the reader with a helpful link to purchase an inexpensive flight. I would say this is not independent.
  • [6] InfoGEI Independent, but not significant coverage; just describes the airline's first flight in 4 sentences.
  • [7] Promociones Aereas Promotional website that provides timetables and prices for booking a flight. Not significant, independent coverage.
  • [8] Info Viajera This is just a press release with 4 sentences of introduction. Not significant, independent coverage.
• Based on this I lean delete as the sources in the article do not demonstrate significant, independent coverage from reliable sources. -- Reconrabbit 19:20, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I'm not sure about the reliability of HilssaMansen19's sources, but I think the Aviacion News interview has enough to count towards notability per Wikipedia:Interviews#Notability and isn't the only coverage there. Aviacionline reads as enthusiastic which tracks with that part of the world and does not mean promotional, and isn't the only coverage from them There is also ch-aviation. There is also Perfil, infobae, and La Nacion. Enough for WP:THREE. DCsansei (talk) 06:18, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[6] - Not a Reliable source, [7] - Not a Reliable source, [8] - Not a Reliable source, [9] - Not a Reliable source, [10] - It can be considered, but it is not a byline, [11] - Not a Reliable source. Bakhtar40 (talk) 09:47, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The company is too young and has not reached much notability yet. It seems like it was set up to promote the new company. Ramos1990 (talk) 04:54, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 06:58, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Either the sources listed are enthusiast blogs and therefore fail WP:RS or are regurgitated press releases and announcements. Doesn't even come close to meeting the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:18, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.