Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hups

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 20:54, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hups

Hups (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article seems to be a joke. It was already proposed for deletion by WikiDan61 in 2009, but Bfhupperts, the creator of this article removed the tag one day later without explanation in the edit summary. Bfhupperts has only those two contributions to Wikipedia. I cite WikiDan61 for the reason which I agree: 'No verification found that "Hups" is a common abbreviation of "Hupperts". No sources provided for any other information in the article. "Huppert" already exists, and a redirect from this page to that would seem improper.' Cyfal (talk) 11:09, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This was likely a hoax at the time of its creation. No indications that this abbreviation is used for the name Hupperts. No indications that a village named Hups-Jolie exists in France. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:02, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – per nom. Appears to be a joke. Luckily the interlanguage links are manual links in the article, so nothing will need to be fixed if this is deleted. – Margin1522 (talk) 23:31, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is a copy of a 2009 version of Hubert with the names changed. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment That would make it an A10 speedy delete. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:53, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.