Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huzzah (Generalization thereof)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - seems like an attempt to define the word "huzzah". Also contains Spanish conjugations. Really I don't know what this is supposed to be... Wickethewok 05:57, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, too much of a jumble to transwiki to wiktionary. Agree with nom. -- Samir (the scope) 06:11, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Dictdef plus original research. Feezo (Talk) 06:14, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, the article is very "un-wikipedia-like", and makes no sense.--Dp462090 | Talk | Contrib | 06:15, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Part-dictdef, part-original research, all rubbish. "The creators of the verb 'Huzzah'...".  (aeropagitica)  06:15, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete gibberish. Bucketsofg 06:17, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: So many reasons to choose from - I believe I'll pick POV-fork of Huzzah. Peter Grey 07:01, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. JIP | Talk 09:39, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 23:22, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep but not as an article. Move it to the page of bad article examples. It's hilarious and surreal. Made me laugh out loud. The title is a classic! Tyrenius 02:19, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  Did you mean : BJAODN? ;) - Mailer Diablo 11:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.