Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hybrid automation framework
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:14, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hybrid automation framework (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to be a notable term, and in fact appears to be spam by Jonathon Wright (talk · contribs). OSborn arfcontribs. 03:17, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- OSborn arfcontribs. 03:18, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - nelogism coined by the article author, using a Wikipedia:Single-purpose account. Dialectric (talk) 12:39, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article failsto meet the verifility policy and is a neologism Alpha Quadrant talk 14:08, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.