Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hybrid rudiments

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --slakr^\ talk / 11:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hybrid rudiments (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Completely unverifiable. Out of the three external links that actually deal with hybrid rudiments, one is no longer there, one is a geocities site, and the other is just a personal website from some engineering major from Minnesota. Also, many of the ones listed are complete neologisms (cheesy pancakes, threesomes, and Doctoral Theses, for example, all have people who have claimed to invented them. Even the ones that DO have descriptions are almost nothing but pure jargon. Evan Seeds (talk)(contrib.) 04:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Toast it!

Fine by me. I just created this article to get the hybrid stuff out of the "rudiments" article anyway. IMHO most of what is in there is total crap. BTW, while you are in the process of deleting worthless articles, check out on the ones on Moeller Method, Snare technique, and Open, closed, open. Brad Halls (talk) 03:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Scientizzle 16:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.