Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hydroconstictulator
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. This should have been speedied as a joke article, per WP:VAND.-Splashtalk 02:36, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hoax or attempt to create a neologism. Either way, it's not a real word, generates no Google hits and doesn't belong on Wikipedia Some guy 04:44, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - likely a hoax. constictulator also gives no hits google -Meegs 07:36, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete just seems like the author was trying to create a new dihydrogen monoxide situation. Das Nerd 07:16, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wish they'd put in the effort they put in here to improve another article. --Impaciente 08:10, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. --Nlu 08:59, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Nonsensectomise. Or if you prefer, delete. It's good nonsense though, but those rogue apostrophe's are just unforgivable.Peeper 10:14, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per nom. --StuffOfInterest 14:00, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.