- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete under A7, non-remarkable band. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:47, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable new band, it appears. Fails WP:MUSIC The Evil Spartan 18:35, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. No assertion of notability, unsigned, no reliable sources. Tagged for speedy. Cquan (after the beep...) 18:38, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- They do make vague claims of notability, but by association only and very, very minimal. 93 Google hits, no WP:RS - delete. Tony Fox (arf!) 19:50, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Source pertaining to HypeVercabs notability
Hypnotiq Truth 20:55, 30 August 2007 (UTC)Hypnotiq Truth[reply]
- None of those appear to be independent reliable sources; one's a blog, I'm not sure that 8180 is notable, and the other two appear to be promotional. Please take a look at the music guidelines and the reliable sources guidelines and point out how this group meets notability based on those. Tony Fox (arf!) 22:40, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I tagged this one for speedy once before, it was deleted right after that. No new information has come up. All external links are either promotional, blogs from the articles author or other quite likely NN references. Currently doesn't fall in line with WP:MUSIC, also fails WP:COI as should be evident from the authors username and the blogs links referenced in the article. Andante1980 06:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.