- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Soft Delete, no previously contested PROD. AfD nom stands unopposed for over ten days, so this is the equivalent of a PROD deletion. (NPASR). :) ·Salvidrim!· ✉ 17:39, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- HyperBrew (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
HyperScan page already exist LiraNuna (talk) 01:57, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This page has some interesting information about reverse engineering of the HyperScan product, but the lead is a possible copyright violation of [Forums: HyperBrew]; I could not tell which came page first. I did not find any in depth sources that were independent of the HyperBrew project. --Mark viking (talk) 04:07, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 09:17, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.