- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hyper Cow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Historical caffeinated milk product, might be worth a footnote in the manufacturer's page, but none-such exists. Very light coverage, best I could find was this piece] in a local journal; not enough to establish notability. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 01:50, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 07:15, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 14:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unnotable topic. Cloudz679 19:07, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.