This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 18:39, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - very little evidence of any significance. It was a cleanup page, but when I investigaed it, band members name reveal no true Google hits and I'm not sure this band meets any substantial criteria for inclusion. But I'm prepared to be proved wrong because I like the name! (This comment was deleted and replaced with the useful 'hyper viper rules') Budgiekiller 16:32, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
- I disagree. I've found this page to be not only informative but it opened my eyes to a completely different type of music than I'm used to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.164.232.99 (talk • contribs) 23:17, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
- This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. No opinion since I haven't checked it out myself, but since this subpage has been repeatedly vandalized, I'm sorely tempted to vote delete just to spite the anons. —Cryptic (talk) 12:07, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:MUSIC. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 13:55, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No assertion of meeting WP:MUSIC. allmusic has never heard of them. Friday (talk) 15:13, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above. -- Kjkolb 20:01, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.