- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. --Fang Aili 說嗎? 14:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable material Rainman420 06:46, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep appears to have something of interest. Explanation, history, references.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! 07:30, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for reasons best stated in the first sentence: "Hyperstition is a neologism and portmanteau combining the words hyper and superstition." Smerdis of Tlön 19:34, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - needs some work, but I'd say it's notable enough to keep. --Valermos 21:37, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I hate neologisms that combine Greek and Latin. More importantly, it's just not notable: 231 unique Google hits, most of which are for pages that point to one blog. David Sneek 21:41, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Original research if nothing else. Denni ☯ 02:08, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete neologism and original research Jaranda wat's sup 20:55, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the first four words of the article. See WP:NEO. However, don't say "non-notable", please. Stifle (talk) 00:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete, blog material, vanity. "faith moves mountains" is not exactly a new concept and doesn't need a flurry of cheap neologisms. dab (ᛏ) 12:43, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.