Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypothesis of linear regression

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hypothesis of linear regression (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Over-sophisticated and unnecessary given numerous other articles related to linear regression Melcombe (talk) 17:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or redirect. This idea is sufficiently covered in other articles such as linear regression and the way it's covered here is just an exercise in overly complicated notation. If this were specifically about testing the hypothesis with, e.g. a derivation of a likelihood-ratio test and its null probability distribution, one could perhaps consider that a reason to keep this, but it's not clear that that wouldn't belong in other articles treating regression. Michael Hardy (talk) 20:13, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - unnecessary fork —G716 <^T·_C> 04:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.