Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Born to Run

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to What We Live For. Consensus. (non-admin closure) J947 18:28, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Born to Run (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NMUSIC, and while it gets a lot of hits on searches, they are all of the simple mention in article about either the band or the album. Both the band and the album are notable, but can't find enough in-depth coverage of the song to rise to the level of passing WP:GNG. Should be redirect, particularly in its current poorly sourced condition, but an editor continues to insist on recreating the article, without improvement. Onel5969 TT me 12:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to What We Live For. This is simple and we shouldn't waste too much editor time debating deletion vs. redirect. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:43, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I agree, Another Believer, please see my response on your talk page. Onel5969 TT me 16:28, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to What We Live For per above comments. Aoba47 (talk) 18:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.