Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm O.K - A Murder Simulator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 19:36, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm O.K - A Murder Simulator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article gives no indication of notability with multiple independent reliable sources. Whispering 13:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• • Much better I'm withdrawing my nom due to the great work of Brighterorange feel free to close the AfD. Whispering 16:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Per nom. No notabiltiy, no references. /Blaxthos 13:52, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep The story about the video game's creation is cute, but the game itself is otherwise not notable. Shalom ^Hello 16:09, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge relevant information into Jack Thompson (attorney) Will ^(talk) 17:31, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. QuagmireDog 17:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Had a whole page to itself in the UK version of PC Zone last year as their 'Free web game of the month.' DarkSaber2k 08:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep there's actually a lot more about this, it's not the subject's fault no one's fixed it. There was a pile of stuff involving Penny Arcade also covering the $10k that I can find, and Child's Play came about as a result of it, too. It needs citing, not deletion; I'll work on it after I get my signpost article done. --Thespian 08:46, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Needs the sources to establish the notability, but I'm pretty certain those can be found if one goes looking. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 09:52, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep; notable in the computer gaming community. *Dan T.* 12:26, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• strong keep Could use more of this integrated into the article, but there is loads of media coverage surrounding this game (naturally, since it is a media stunt) and plenty of real world context to fill an encyclopedia entry. — brighterorange (talk) 14:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep. This is notable, and there have been many mentions in magazines, etc. Andre (talk) 23:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 23:07, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notable. ¿SFGiДnts! ^{¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review!} 21:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment On sources added to the article, the first two are from blogs and the third only gives passing mention to the game. We need better sources than that is there anyway to get a scan or a webpage for the UK PC Zone? Whispering 10:57, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added a couple that I found on Lexis-Nexis. Of course we don't need the sources to be online for them to be reliable (although it makes them more useful, naturally)... — brighterorange (talk) 15:05, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.