Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Only A Woman
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete... WP:SNOW, since this is not an article. Would likely be a CSD G11 as self-promotion or CSD G12 as a copyright violation anyway. --Kinu t/c 22:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm Only A Woman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is not an encyclopaedia article but a short work of fiction. It is non-notable and presumed unpublished elsewhere. The author's other contribs all constituted vandalism; creation of this article seems to have been a reaction to a final warning on their Talk page. SHEFFIELDSTEELTALK 13:53, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong, possibly speedy delete If the author didn't write this story himself (WP:MADEUP), it is a copyright violation (WP:COPYVIO). – sgeureka t•c 14:10, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - essay / original work. Frank | talk 14:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Pure OR work of fiction. Nsk92 (talk) 14:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Get the mop, as per previous comments. Ecoleetage (talk) 15:07, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete not notable at all QuirkyAndSuch (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per nom. Most bizarre thing I have ever seen. CSD should really be amended to cover this kind of "article". -- EhsanQ (talk) 16:06, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete You missed WP:NOT - Wiki isn't a collection of novels! I wonder how many other WP violations we can list before this gets deleted...? StephenBuxton (talk) 16:39, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per sgeureka. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 21:01, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.