Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm dressed this way for United Way
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to United Way. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 10:32, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- I'm dressed this way for United Way (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable and non encyclopedic. [Belinrahs | 'sup? | what'd I do?] 18:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- possible speedy delete as spam... even charities can spam. Hairhorn (talk) 19:04, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into United Way This is spammy but belongs there. --WngLdr34 (talk) 19:08, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to United Way as per WngLdr34, above. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 19:50, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into United Way per WngLdr34 ArcAngel (talk) 20:27, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge. As above. --Whoosit (talk) 20:42, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge: per the statements above, the article should be merged..South Bay (talk) 20:58, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow Merge: Per above. Joe Chill (talk) 23:43, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into United Way. This sounds like an notable, interesting program, but doesn't warrant its own page. Shanata (talk) 03:58, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.