Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm in Love Without You

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Finneas O'Connell. As a valid alternative to deletion. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:21, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in Love Without You (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails the Notability guidelines for songs in wikipedia as not only none of the three bullet points in the guidelines are met, but also there is not a single "subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." Furthermore, the links are ot interviews with the artist "This excludes media reprints of press releases, or other publications where the artist, its record label, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the work", and the only source that could be consider here "One to watch" is under a discussion for being unreliable. See here MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:35, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MaranoFan Lol Mind blown! To funny. 🤣 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ DarklyShadows (talk) 16:57, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect due to a lack of coverage from third-party, reliable sources. I recommend a redirect over an outright deletion as this could be a viable search term. Aoba47 (talk) 21:10, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.