Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm in Love with My Car

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. A merge discussion can continue at the appropriate talk page. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 15:11, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in Love with My Car

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable song I+delete+things+alot (talk) 16:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:50, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - B-side of Bohemian Rhapsody; sold millions. Radiopathy •talk• 23:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:MUSIC says nothing about B-sides, it should be merged then. I+delete+things+alot (talk) 04:48, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. Notability is not inherited so being the b-side of a very famous song by a very famous band does not save the article. The first sentence of WP:NSONGS says, "Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." So it fails that criteria with one self-published reference. Having established that there is nothing here which isn't already in the album article or in BR there's nothing to keep. --Richhoncho (talk) 13:06, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Richhoncho. Seems like a good solution. SW3 5DL (talk) 18:07, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article in its current form contains significant encyclopedic information that would likely be lost in the event of a merge. I might add that the username of User:I+delete+things+alot is disruptive and should be changed per WP:USERNAME; it also contains a spelling or spacing error. Newyorkbrad (talk) 22:58, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Newyorkbrad. Deletion doesn't improve our coverage of Queen. And sources are apparent in searches. --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:55, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Newyorkbrad - Queen's notable & so are there albums, You might want to pick a less disruptive name before nominating more articles!. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 08:59, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.