Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IBM Tivoli Directory Integrator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IBM Tivoli Directory Integrator

Blatant spam. WP:PEACOCK terms in most paragraphs. If this was a newish page I would have taken it straight to CSD. A promise to 'clean this up after Easter vacation' hasn't been kept. Spammy from the first version. Mr Stephen 21:53, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spamdelete Pavel Vozenilek 22:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The picture of a power tool may come handy somewhere, though. Pavel Vozenilek 22:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This reads a whole lot like a four-colored glossy for the product. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 23:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - looking through the history, there is not a single version that doesn't llok like ad copy. The latest version is in fact a copyright violation with text copied directly from ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/tivoli/tivoli-advisor/Tivoli-Advisor-Issue-10.pdf

-- Whpq 13:03, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A smaller page could later be written. --MarkWahl 21:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - At a glance, I can't see anything that isn't sales pitch and/or copyvio. This doesn't mean 100% that the subject is non-article-worthy, but there's nothing here that asserts it and as we'd have to start from scratch, may as well delete this one. Fourohfour 17:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.