- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 10:44, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
AfD template was placed on the article by User:213.23.107.70, who could not create this page. I'm going to go ahead and complete the nomination on the grounds that the article does not assert that the company meets WP:CORP criteria. —C.Fred (talk) 14:54, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CORP. Article provides no independent sources. Approximately 228 unique English-language GHits, none of which appear to satisfy WP:V. --Satori Son 09:06, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. JPD (talk) 11:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Vary | Talk 16:05, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom ST47 18:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Very Weak Keep -- a couple of independent mentions in google.de, which may satisfy WP:Corp. Leuko 20:18, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.