- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. The JPStalk to me 18:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam and possible hoax. Article was created by Icpse (talk · contribs), which bears a close correlation to ICP Systems. I propose that the article may be something of a hoax due to the fact that the picture of the headquarters appears to be some other building with "ICP Systems" PhotoShopped in. --Bugwit Speak / Spoken 14:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This image in this article is NOT the headquarters of ICP Systems and has no link to the company in any way. The article itself is accurate apart from the picture (which should be deleted). ICP Systems is based in the UK and associated buildings are not listed, and there are also no available pictures published, to maintain the confidential integrity of the organisation. I am glad that the above user has identified this problem. The image should be removed from the article and Wikipedia's server so that the image cannot be accessed. Many thanks to "bugwit" for identifying this article which is indeed is misleading. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aminislam (talk • contribs) .
- This image was placed for test purposes to see how an image would appear in the page. I am new to wikipedia and was experimenting, this image has no association with the ICP Systems organisation and was only placed for testing purposes. Rest of the article is completely factual, visit www.icpse.com and click "about icp" tab for proof, or e-mail the website administrator (support@icpse.com) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Icpse (talk • contribs) .
- Comment I appreciate your attention in removing the misleading image, but the article still appears to be for promotional purposes only, especially given the fact that one of the arguments in favor of keeping the article was created by Aminislam (talk · contribs), who is named in the article as the CEO and President, and the other was created by Icpse (talk · contribs), who is the article creator, and apparently has some connection with the company. Please refer to WP:SPAM and What Wikipedia is Not. --Bugwit Speak / Spoken 17:02, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am not really fussed, go ahead and delete the article. What you are saying is an opinion, i belive that all i have written is a BACKGROUND to an organisation, you shold delete the articles about Microsoft and all the other organisations too, im sure there are millions,i hope you have enough time on your'e hands, im sure you do. There is no indication of promotion in the article, only facts. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Icpse (talk • contribs) July 27, 2006.
- Delete: Whether a hoax, it doesn't pass the Google test (887 exact hits) and fails WP:CORP. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 17:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Stop saying "delete delete" and just delete the article! like i said im not botherd. Sorry for not keeping a cool head earlier i was just frustrated, you guys are quite relaxed youreselves and speak in a respectable mannar. Im sure youre doing a good job and im not going to argure with youre opinions as wikipedia is very clean and useful from my experience thanks to you guys. But pleease do delete the article because i think it is causing unnessecery fuss. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icpse (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.