Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IC 3622

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of IC objects. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IC 3622

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

IC 3622 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NASTRO as a galaxy in the IC (historically non-notable in deletion discussions), and discovered post-1850. Could not find any significant coverage that would make the galaxy pass WP:GNG. SirMemeGod  15:36, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

redirect to list of IC objects ‹hamster717🐉› ^{(discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠)} 15:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to list of IC objects; no significant coverage. Praemonitus (talk) 20:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of IC objects. 21 Andromedae (talk) 15:42, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Agreed with the redirect to List of IC objects. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 18:03, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.