Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IDAMS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:45, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IDAMS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software. No independent sources in the article and nothing obvious in google. PROD removed with an argument that appeared to be that notability was inherited from UNESCO. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:57, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 10:05, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 12:07, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:41, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No non-trivial coverage found. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 19:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete simply having a software program available on a site does not really provide notability, unless it is the subject of instruction at major universities or widely used in school systems. The essay, not a guideline, at Wikipedia:Notability_(software) can be instructive. Here, we do not have significant coverage. --Bejnar (talk) 01:48, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete likely unless this can be mentioned further at another article such UNESCO and I found some Books links as well as browser and Scholar but maybe nothing for better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.