Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ID Flow (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete the whole shebang. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- ID Flow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software product. No assertion of notability and no sources. Previous AfD closed as no-consensus: received only two responses (one from an apparent single-purpose account): Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ID Flow KFP (contact | edits) 21:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages because they are similar pages for the same company's other products. The parent article Jolly Technologies was speedy deleted per WP:CSD#A7, but since A7 doesn't apply to products... (prod not possible since one was previously challenged):
- Label Flow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Lobby Track (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- delete Gotta agree with nom on this one. The sources are not exactly 3rd party RS style links, and not plentiful enough. Just not enough coverage outside of a couple of mentions in trade mags. Dennis Brown (talk) 21:34, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt Not notable, never likely to meet notabillity requirements either. Can't find WP:RS Chzz ► 21:37, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- delete all 3, non notable software, references would not count as independent. My ealier prod was removed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.