- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Obvious. Naconkantari 02:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Do we really need this page? Seems like nonsense to me ScotchMB 01:14, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - extremely unencyclopedic. Kalani [talk] 01:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete No questions asked. Lorty 01:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete, useless. Voice of Treason 01:53, 24 July 2006
(UTC)
- Very speedy delete Nonsense.Reppin the bay 01:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Quick... Speedy Delete! --Shane (talk/contrib) 01:58, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per db-group. So tagged. Fan-1967 02:02, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy A7 as article about group with no assertion of notability. Could possibly be an A1 for lack of context. --Kinu t/c 02:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Non-notable A7. -Royalguard11Talk 02:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete about as unencyclopedic as it gets. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.