- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Griffith University. MBisanz talk 04:57, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- IIIS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
fails WP:ORG. almost no third party coverage Google news search. Michellecrisp (talk) 06:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Griffith University, which seems to be a large, important university down there. Without sources this article can only repeat the information from the department's website, however it seems to be important enough to merit a mention and a link in the other article. Steve Dufour (talk) 07:21, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete rather than merge since this article is too vague, indefinite and non referenced. The article should cite research and studies performed. Surely the organization can dig up facts that can be referenced in scientific publications (which may not be indexed by Google). As is, this article does not meet my understanding of WP:V or WP:N policy. - DustyRain (talk) 06:10, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:20, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:22, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.