- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 03:35, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- IJSME (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article was PRODded with reason "New journal, not a single article published yet. No independent sources, not indexed in any selective database. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals." DePRODDed by anonymous IP with reason "has filed application for ISSN Number and is under consideration". Of course, having an ISSN or nt has nothing to do with notability. Hence: Delete. --Randykitty (talk) 17:11, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No attained Notability. AllyD (talk) 17:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: New journal, no publications yet so nothing to be notable for. Let's have a positive outlook and call it WP:TOOSOON (WP:CRYSTALBALL is so glass-half-empty...) -- BenTels (talk) 18:29, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I checked the website and IMO it's a fake for fishing e-mail addresses or whatever they do intend.--Eusc (talk) 20:37, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. —Ed!(talk) 16:43, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 22:49, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 22:49, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not finding any coverage in reliable sources for this new journal; fails WP:N. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:02, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Absolutely no reliable sources cover and very suspicious website. Might be a speedy A7. Probable scam. Mcewan (talk) 16:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.