Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMDEX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Does not appear to be notable, and lacks any 3rd party non-trivial citaetions to back it up. -Djsasso (talk) 21:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IMDEX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No evidence this conference is in any way notable. Trivial ghits, mainly about 'upcoming presentations' at past conferences. Travellingcari (talk) 17:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 18:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ryan Postlethwaite 23:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. There is news coverage such as this, and it appears that the conference is attended by top members of the naval forces as noted here. -- Whpq (talk) 18:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep - but move to full name of the conference with a redir for the abbreviation, and put some better sources on this thin stub. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or Merge into another article, not even close to being within the guidelines.--Sallicio^{${\displaystyle \color {Red}\oplus }$} 21:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What article would be the target for a merge? And what guidelines does this article fall outside of? -- Whpq (talk) 22:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The target article would be whatever the author can find to merge it in to. The only notablility asserted is what the author states. There are no references or third-party citations. These are the basics for notability (among other things) but this still lacks those two prerequisites. Cheers!--Sallicio^{${\displaystyle \color {Red}\oplus }$} 22:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Unreferenced, notability is not established. WWGB (talk) 00:51, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.