Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMPULSE (Database by CACI)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IMPULSE (Database by CACI)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"Contested" prod (endorsed by another editor). Appears to be non-notable piece of software. Article unsourced except for a couple of links to subject's website. Reads like advert. Christopher Connor (talk) 23:52, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:N and WP:V (lack of secondary sources). This article falls just short of db-g11. (If I recall, I was the one who supported the original prod tag.) elektrik SHOOS 08:38, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is an Oracle based database system with a central core of data on pupils, establishments, assessment results, benchmarking, contextual data and financial data. It is Around the core are a number of modules for provision of operational systems like SEN, FSM, Transport and so on. The system comes with all necessary standard and statutory reports, including Form 7 in all of its variations. This is also borderline patent nonsense; this swatch of text lacks enough context to enable any not familiar with the field (U.S. educational bureaucracy?) to learn anything from it. And, as noted, it's unambiguous advertising for a product with a small market, and this software product contains no indication of historical, technical, or cultural significance, and as such lacks "long term historical notability". - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.